MAX Dental Implants

The MAX tapered dental implant system is the first to allow for immediate placement into a multi-rooted molar extraction site.

External Hex Connection – MAX Implants
TRI-NEX® Connection – TRI-MAX® Implants
IT Connection, MAXIT Implants

A conventional implant is not suited for immediate placement in the molar extraction socket. As a result, waiting periods of three to four months are necessary to allow for healing of the socket prior to implant placement. Often, the healed extraction site presents reduced bone height, inadequate for implant placement without a bone augmentation procedure.


The award-winning MAX dental implant systems feature a body with a larger-than-conventional diameter to fill the molar site, ultimately achieving primary stability from engagement with the inter-radicular bone.. With tapered dental implant bodies and an enhanced surface, the MAX tapered dental implant is designed to fit the natural shape of the molar socket. The end result is an optimal implant fit in the multi-rooted immediate extraction site that minimizes bone loss and reduces treatment time.

  • American Academy of Osseointegration (AO) – Best Innovation Award, 2008
  • The SABS – Design Excellence Award – Medical Devices, 2010
Technical Facts
  • 7mm, 8mm and 9mm diameter, (6mm diameter External Hex MSc only)
  • Greater degree of taper
  • 7mm, 9mm, and 11mm lengths
  • Enhanced surface
  • Available in External Hex, Internal Hex TRI-NEX® and Internal Octagon connections
Surgical and Prosthetic Benefits
  • Fits multi-rooted molar socket and allows for immediate placement following extraction
  • Maximizes bone preservation
  • Minimizes need for bone grafting
  • Avoids adjacent tooth roots
  • Increases patient acceptance
  • Reduces treatment time
  • Ability to use standard surgical protocol and instrumentation with minimal additions
  • Ability to use compatible prosthetic components by “platform switching”

Atieh MA, Alsabeeha NHM, Duncan WJ, de Silva RK, Cullinan MP Schwass D, Payne AGT. Immediate single implant restorations in mandibular molar extraction sockets: a controlled clinical trial. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 24, 2013, 484-496 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02415.x.

Atieh MA, Payne AGT, Duncan WJ, de Silva RK, Cullinan, MP. Immediate Placement or Immediate Restoration/Loading of Single Implants for Molar Tootth Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2010, Volume 25, Number 1, 401-415.

Atieh MA, Alsabeeha NHM, Payne AGT, Schwass DR, Duncan WJ. Insertion torque of immediate wide-diameter implants: A finite analysis. Quintessence Int. 2012;43:e115-e126.

Hattingh AC, De Bruyn H, Ackermann A, Vandeweghw S. Immediate Placement of Ultrawide-Diameter Implants in Molar Sockets: Description of a Recommended Technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2018;38:17-23. doi: 10.11607/prd.3433.

Egbert N, Ahuja S, Selecman A, Wicks R. Single tooth restoration in the maxilla with an ultra-wide diameter implant: A clinical report. J Adv Oral Res 2016;7(3):41-45.

Smith RB, Tarnow DP. Classification of Molar Extraction Sites for Immediate Dental Implant Placement: Technical Note. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2013;28:911-916: doi 10.11607/jomi.2627.

Vandeweghe S, Ackermann A, Bronner J, Hattingh A, Tschakaloff A, De Bruyn H. A Retrospective, Multicenter Study on a Novo Wide-Body Implant for Posterior Regions. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 2009, 1-12. Doi 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00253.x.

Vandeweghe S, De Bruyn H. A within-implant comparison to evaluate the concept of platform switching. A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 2012;5(3):253-262.

Vandeweghe S, Hattingh A, Wennerberg A, De Bruyn H. Surgical Protocol and Short-Term Clinical Outcome of Immediate Placement in Molar Extraction Sockets Using a Wide Body Implant.
J Oral Maxillofac Res 2011 (Jul-Sep);2(3):e1.

Vandeweghe S, De Ferrerre R, Tschakaloff A. De Bruyn H. A Wide-Body Implant as an Alternative for Sinus Lift or Bone Grafting. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;69:e67-e74

Downloadable Documents

Show Buttons
Hide Buttons